We

The true GuSeJu, who appeared after 6,000 years of human history, is not only the GuSeJu of SeungNiJeDan devotees but also the GuSeJu of all humanity.

Therefore, the meaning of ‘we’ refers to all of you from every country and region around the world who have not yet come to SeungNiJeDan.

According to JuNim’s words, there are currently many people on this Earth who directly see JuNim’s face or the ESeulSeongSin descending purely white. Since these people do not know JuNim, some call him Jesus, others Buddha, some an alien prophet, and others the god they believe in. Ije-Baro, when the time comes, all these people will recognise JuNim.

After confirming the face that appeared in dreams, the face and voice of the revealer at SeungNiJeDan, and researching SeungNiJeDan on the internet, lo and behold, only results filled with threatening expressions like ‘heresy’, ‘cult’, ‘murderous group’ poured out. I will summarise and explain the situation where, after searching for the GuSeJu, the content was plastered with things like a ‘den of evil’.

The national reform tasks for Korea in 2026 are ‘prosecutorial reform’, ‘judicial reform’, and ‘media reform’. Prosecutorial reform and judicial reform have already passed the National Assembly around March 2026. By October, the Public Prosecutors’ Office will be abolished, and judges who distorted the law will be punished. However, media reports continue to create issues as if these matters are still under discussion, spreading fog to obscure the truth, and it is impossible to find related reports on Gemini or in foreign media, whether due to filtering or an embargo.

To explain prosecutorial reform, it aims to rectify the abuses caused by prosecutors monopolising investigative and indictment powers, leading to selective investigations and fabricating criminals. Judicial reform is necessary because judges have arbitrarily interpreted the law and delivered unjust rulings. Media reform, for example, starts from the premise of punishing situations like the current one, where the truth is ignored and distorted, false reports are rampant.

Most of the information provided when searching the internet about the GuSeJu of humanity and SeungNiJeDan consists of fake news and malicious articles. The reason for this is precisely the current reform tasks: the prosecution, judges, the media, and the forces manipulating them from beneath – namely, the Christian network.

Fact Check

• Jo Hee-seong: At SeungNiJeDan, he is referred to as GuSeJu, Saengmireukbul, JeongDoRyeong, etc., while those in opposition sometimes refer to him as ‘… cult leader’.

• SeungNiJeDan: Those who follow the GuSeJu refer to it as ‘SeungNiJeDan’, while those in opposition call it ‘Yeongsaenggyo’ and treat it as a byword for ‘heresy’, ‘cult’, and ‘murderous group’.

• Did SeungNiJeDan murder Tak Myeong-hwan?: No (The culprit was Lim OO, the driver of the Daeseong Church pastor).

• Charges of murder/instigation of murder against Jo Hee-seong: Not guilty (Supreme Court ruling on 3 September 2004).

Questions

1) A final verdict of not guilty was issued on 3 September 2004, so why, 22 years later in 2026, are there still so many articles like a den of evil?

There is a cunning demonisation trick by the established powers and the media at play here. When flowing chronologically from Point 1, Point 2, Point 3, Point 4, …, to Point 10:

At Point 1, the prosecution filed an indictment.

Then, media reports profusely use terms like ‘… cult leader’, ‘Yeongsaenggyo’, ‘heresy’, ‘cult’, ‘murderous group’, and intensively report that ‘the prosecution indicted [him] on charges of committing such-and-such evil crime’. Current affairs programmes broadcast special features. They introduce horrific incidents that occurred in past heinous ‘heresies’, ‘cults’, and ‘murderous groups’, thereby framing it as a criminal organisation disguised as a religion.

Such a thing could never happen in developed countries. It is unacceptable to disseminate the contents of an indictment to the media as if a court ruling has already been made, especially when no investigation has even taken place. Furthermore, he was indicted on murder charges, but it was a murder charge without the victim’s body.

At Point 2, the prosecution amended the indictment.

The charges were changed from murder to fraud. Then, media reports again flaunt terms like ‘… cult leader’, ‘Yeongsaenggyo’, ‘heresy’, ‘cult’, ‘murderous group’, and report that ‘the prosecution indicted [him] on such-and-such fraud charges’.

Such a thing could never happen in developed countries. If someone is indicted on murder charges and found innocent, they should be released. However, instead of releasing him, they then proceed with an investigation into ‘fraud charges’ involving more people.

Media reports go a step further, reporting as if fraud charges have been added to murder charges, if one listens casually. What they do at this point is, alongside the single fact they are currently reporting (indictment on fraud charges), they repeatedly mention content related to the ‘murder charges’ that have already been dismissed, i.e., content that was found to be unsubstantiated, such as how so-and-so did this and that, thereby imprinting an image on the public. This image-making is repeated every time there is an update from the prosecution. Smaller media outlets then serially repeat such reports based on what major media outlets have reported.

At Point 3, reports of unearthed buried remains shake the nation.

During the investigation, there were instances where bones were found by randomly digging up various locations claimed to be where bodies were secretly buried, using heavy equipment. The media then created another uproar with this, repeatedly imprinting, re-imprinting, and re-re-imprinting a negative image.

This happened a few times; once, the bones turned out to be chicken bones, and another time, they were revealed to be human remains over 100 years old, formally interred in a grave. However, media reports barely covered these facts. They extensively reported on speculation, but remained silent on truthful reports about results that differed from their conjectures.

Regardless of the content of the report, the demonising image-imprinting work was repeatedly carried out with chilling vocabulary, like a song’s chorus: ‘Yeongsaenggyo’, ‘heresy’, ‘cult’, ‘murder charges against so-and-so’, and so on. Their malicious intent is clearly evident.

At Point 4, political power intervenes.

Then President Kim Young-sam, who was a Christian elder, directly instructed the prosecutor over the phone: ‘They say the ESeulSeongSin is invisible, but they manipulated photos to deceive devotees into building a large altar, so isn’t that fraud? Frame him for fraud!’

The prosecutor made that phone call in front of the suspect, Jo Hee-seong. So, Jo Hee-seong himself, who heard it all, testified to it.

So the prosecutor said, ‘The President told me to frame you for fraud, how can you just walk free?’ That is how the investigation into ‘donation fraud’, a crime not even in criminal law, began.

Meanwhile, they investigated everything that could be used as a pretext. The pretext they seized upon at this time was the ‘Attempted Illegal Arrest of Jo Hee-seong by Detectives from the Seoul District Prosecutor’s Office Violent Crimes Division (Choi Soon-hee Incident)’ that occurred on 28 September 1992. The time of Jo Hee-seong’s arrest at Point 1 was 10 January 1994. So, they seized upon a pretext from an incident that occurred much earlier, 2 years and 6 months prior. Although the prosecutor seized upon this pretext at the time, it resulted in a finding of no charges.

The core premise of the ‘donation fraud’ indictment by the prosecutor was that ‘they received donations by manipulating photos and deceiving devotees into believing the ESeulSeongSin was descending, when it was not’.

Therefore, the defence submitted all evidence: various religious scriptures and prophecies testifying to the ESeulSeongSin, testimonies from people who had seen it directly, and even the original film and photos were sent to Mr. Robert J. Groden, a photo analysis expert for the US Senate since 1975, for analysis. Even though a decisive report stating ‘the original had not been altered’ was presented as evidence, the judge did not accept that evidence. Not accepting it as evidence means it would not be considered during the ruling.

Then, Jo Hee-seong, as the defendant, directly requested the judge:

‘Your Honour, please verify directly whether the ESeulSeongSin descends or not. Please confirm whether we manipulated photos or not. There is a church here in the detention centre, so please allow us to worship with our devotees, and then let anyone, be it a judge, prosecutor, or journalist, come and take photos to verify it.’

Despite the polite request, the judge dismissed even that request for verification. Originally, if a defendant requests verification, it must be confirmed. However, the judge ignored that request and instead delivered a guilty verdict, stating that he had manipulated photos and deceived devotees into giving donations, thus constituting donation fraud. This was the process by which the first imprisonment unfolded.

Throughout this entire process, whenever there was an update from the prosecution or the court, media reports poured out, invariably applying that malicious frame, unleashing a flood of speculation and slander.

At Point 5, the prosecution fabricates a case, filing duplicate charges for a case that has already been ruled upon.

As Jo Hee-seong was serving a 2-year and 6-month prison sentence, and was due to be released in about a year, a second indictment was filed.

The prosecutor fabricated the very case that was dismissed at Point 4, transforming it into ‘an incident that occurred under Jo Hee-seong’s instruction’ and filed an indictment. Then, media reports poured out like a flood, and although the case eventually fizzled out with no charges, the media play was a success.

Furthermore, they would indict on anything, proceed with an investigation, and then draw in other people to create other charges. Thus, it was an indictment that additionally applied donation fraud charges, viewing them as other victims of the ‘donation fraud’ crime for which a guilty verdict had already been issued at Point 4.

The defence’s appeal was: ‘Those people did not attend the altar at the time, did not make donations, and were not in a financial position to do so.’ ‘Here is the audio tape evidence showing they conspired to testify for each other, saying they saw each other making donations. They did not make donations and are giving false testimonies.’

However, the judge repeatedly dismissed the defendant’s requests for evidence verification and added 4 years to the prison sentence for donation fraud. Invariably, media reports poured out, misleading the public by mixing in preposterous stories like mass murder and obscuring the truth, thereby deceiving the public and people worldwide who, at the time, believed ‘media reports = truthful reports’.

The judge sentenced the defendant to severe punishment based on this absurd case fabrication, without even verifying the evidence of donations.

In fact, prior to this trial, there was a civil lawsuit concerning the same matter. On 8 March 1996, Choi Ok-hee filed a civil lawsuit demanding compensation of 100 million won in donations, and there was a ruling to return only 50 million won. So, Choi Ok-hee filed an appeal. While that appeal was ongoing, this trial began afterwards.

So, Choi Ok-hee’s case involved requesting the return of donations in two trials simultaneously. However, the amounts for the same donation cases differed. In the civil trial, she claimed 100 million won was donated, but in this trial, she submitted a claim for 210 million won. This was clearly false. And it is impossible for the same claim to be tried in two places at once.

But there’s something even more absurd. The purpose of this trial was to criminally prosecute Jo Hee-seong to either execute him or imprison him for a longer period, which is why it proceeded as a criminal lawsuit.

So, in the first instance ruling, he was found guilty of donation fraud and sentenced to 7 years in prison, with an order to compensate them by returning the entire amount they claimed. However, the appellate court ‘dismissed the compensation ruling’. This makes no sense, even by common standards.

Anyway, with the compensation ruling dismissed by the appellate court, the complainants were unable to receive money. So, they proceeded to a civil trial, where the court sided with people who had not even made donations, resulting in a situation where approximately 900 million won had to be paid out. At this point, if the money was paid late, SeungNiJeDan’s building could have been put up for auction, creating a critical situation.

At Point 6, parole

Jo Hee-seong served 7 years in prison and was released on parole on 15 August 2000. On that day, he only met with devotees at the altar, and from the next day onwards, he led worship services daily.

At Point 7, extortion and threats began.

This was about a year after his parole. There were actual murderers (A, B), and murderer B and his brother-in-law C, believing the statute of limitations for murder was 10 years, C instigated B to begin extortion and threats.

Initially, they sent threatening letters, and later, they called to demand money. They demanded money in this manner for almost three years, and eventually, they (B, C) filmed themselves extorting at the site where the victims were secretly buried, sent the video, and threatened to send it to a broadcasting station if their demands were not met.

Jo Hee-seong and SeungNiJeDan ignored the threats and did not comply with the demands.

At Point 8, arrest and indictment on charges of instigation of murder

Since the demands of the extortion and threats were not met, the videotape was eventually delivered to a current affairs programme on KBS, and then fell into the hands of the prosecutor, who immediately arrested and indicted Jo Hee-seong on ‘charges of instigation of murder’.

Logically, this incident occurred because the money demanded through extortion and threats was not paid. Is it reasonable to ignore the fact that the money was not paid, and instead accept evidence of instigation of murder from a videotape created by B and C for extortion and threats? Does that make any sense?

However, the prosecutor and judge accepted something incomprehensible by common sense as fact, and in the first instance trial, sentenced Jo Hee-seong to ‘death’.

Excluding Jo Hee-seong, there were 5 people involved in the crime, of whom 4 (B, C, D, E) were arrested. C was B’s brother-in-law, who, knowing B was a murderer, instigated B to plan extortion to seize money from SeungNiJeDan. D and E were people who, unknowingly, made phone calls to arrange for the victim to meet at the crime scene.

At this point, with culprit A missing, the prosecutor collaborated with culprits B, C, and D to plan and fabricate the case, making it appear as though Jo Hee-seong had instigated the murder.

An absurd incident occurred during the trial: while the first instance trial was ongoing for several sessions, culprit A, the ringleader who was on the run, was arrested and brought into the courtroom.

The Prosecutor’s Scenario. At the time the prosecutor wrote this scenario, culprit A, the ringleader, had not been caught. This ringleader A received instructions to instigate murder from Jo Hee-seong and told culprit B, ‘The order came down.’ Then, to draw in culprit D, culprit B told culprit D words to the effect of, ‘Listen carefully, culprit D, Jo Hee-seong told me that such an instruction came down from culprit A, so you, culprit D, must also participate.’ (This is all the evidence for the charge of instigation of murder that led to Jo Hee-seong’s death sentence. It is solely their word, ‘heard’.)

Anyway, the prosecutor’s initial scenario was to pin all serious crimes on Jo Hee-seong and ringleader A, while designing reasons for leniency for the collaborating culprits B and D, claiming they had no choice but to follow orders because Yeongsaenggyo was a very frightening place.

The prosecutor openly stated that his sole objective was “to eliminate Jo Hee-seong and SeungNiJeDan,” yet this situation involves framing innocent citizens for murder with that objective, granting reduced sentences to criminals who cooperated to achieve that objective, and to criminals who undermine public welfare. It is clear evidence of how dangerous a profession the prosecutor is, monopolising investigative and prosecutorial powers yet remaining unchecked, posing a significant threat to this society.

However, the ringleader-like murderer (A) stood on the witness stand and testified: “I did not go to SeungNiJeDan on the day stated in the indictment, nor did I visit Jo Hee-seong, nor did I tell B, ‘the order was dropped.’”

Consequently, a major error arose in the prosecutor’s scenario. As a result, the prosecutor’s charges were continuously altered, with critical details such as the location, time, circumstances, and method of conveying the murder instigation being changed multiple times.

Despite these circumstances, the first-instance judge sentenced Jo Hee-seong and perpetrator A to death.

However, as perpetrator A’s testimony complicated the prosecutor’s initial scenario and led to changes in the charges, the sentences for murderer B, attempted extortionist C, and implicated perpetrator D ended up being much higher than initially promised.

Initially, when the deal was struck with the prosecutor, B was promised around 10 years in prison for murder, C a suspended sentence for attempted extortion, and D, due to minor involvement and merely acting as a lookout, a maximum of 1-2 years. However, as the scenario unravelled, B received a life sentence, C 10 months in prison, and D 12 years in prison.

Point 9 is the appellate trial.

Another absurd event unfolded. Perpetrator A’s statement remained unchanged, asserting, “There was no instigation to murder. I have a fiery temper by nature and cannot tolerate those who do bad things; the incident began by mistake when I tried to teach them a lesson.” Perpetrators D, C, and B, in turn, made conscience declarations before the judge: “We did as the prosecutor instructed, but our sentences were greatly increased because we claimed involvement in things we didn’t do, so we are making this conscience declaration. We have never heard the phrase ‘the order was dropped.’ We apologise to Jo Hee-seong and the SeungNiJeDan congregation.” Thus, at the beginning of the appellate trial, it was expected to conclude quickly.

However, this trial also included another charge: ‘harbouring a criminal’. This meant there were many involved parties. Perpetrator E, a woman, was unintentionally implicated in the case, having merely called the victim without knowing why, to arrange a meeting at a certain location. Also involved were individuals who never dreamt they would be connected to this case: woman G, her younger sibling H, L, and Hwang OO of 부산제단 (Busan Jedan).

Thus, there were 10 suspects and 11 lawyers. As the cases were merged, the number of lawyers increased, including two public defenders. Since all those to be defended were in prison, visits to the prison were necessary. The prosecutor obtained the lawyers’ visitation records and countered, “The lawyers persuaded the perpetrators to maintain their conscience declarations and testimonies.”

So, the prosecutor attempted to muddy the waters, claiming that just as he had colluded with and persuaded the perpetrators, the lawyers had also persuaded them, implying fault on both sides.

Now, the key figure in the “harbouring a criminal” charge is Hwang OO of 부산제단 (Busan Jedan). Perpetrator E was not attending the altar at the time, but Hwang OO was in communication with her. Then, when Jo Hee-seong visited 부산제단 (Busan Jedan) to lead a service, Hwang OO made a direct suggestion.

He suggested, “This person used to attend the altar but no longer does, yet still has faith in JuNim. However, her life is very difficult, so how about the altar provides some assistance?”

To which Jo Hee-seong replied, “That is something 부산제단 (Busan Jedan) should handle on its own.”

In this way, Hwang OO received a monthly living allowance from 부산제단 (Busan Jedan), kept some for himself, and passed the rest to perpetrator E. Consequently, Hwang OO was sentenced to 10 months in prison for harbouring a criminal in the first-instance trial.

The main characters in the prosecutor’s initial scenario were B, C, and D, but when perpetrator A’s unexpected testimony ruined that scenario, they revised it repeatedly and created a backup scenario.

This time, they introduced Hwang OO, who, by invoking a deceased person, testified that he had heard from this dead person that he was a murderer and had said, “Jo Hee-seong ordered me to kill 10 people. He mentioned 100 million won per person, totalling 1 billion won.”

If you look closely, the scenario has a signature. The victims of perpetrators A, B, and D total 6 people. However, the prosecutor speaks of 10 people. This refers to transforming all those whose whereabouts were unknown from Point 0 in the past into victims, making it 10 people. Therefore, the 10 people Hwang OO testifies about are the prosecutor’s signature.

Despite Hwang OO’s sudden testimony regarding murder instigation, the appellate court acquitted Jo Hee-seong of the murder instigation charge but sentenced him to 2 years in prison for harbouring a criminal.

At this point, Hwang OO, who had received a 10-month prison sentence in the first instance, was subsequently released on probation in the appellate trial, though it is unknown if this was in exchange for his additional testimony regarding murder instigation.

This Hwang OO was a person who used to boast that because Jo Hee-seong had said, “I will eliminate world communism. If world communism is not abolished, strike me on the back of my head with a flint stone and kill me,” he always carried a flint stone in his pocket. When he actually tried to strike, JuNim suddenly turned around, so he couldn’t. He continued to carry it in his pocket until world communism actually collapsed, at which point he discarded the heavy flint stone.

Point 10 is GuSeJu’s BoGwang.

Since there was a “death sentence” in the first instance and an “acquittal” in the appellate trial, both the prosecutor and the defence appealed. The prosecutor sought a death sentence, while the defence appealed due to the unjust verdict on the ‘harbouring a criminal’ charge.

In this absurd trial, where the only evidence for murder instigation was the testimonies of the murderers, the truth was once again obscured by the ‘prosecutor’s persuasion’ revealed in the perpetrators’ conscience declarations and the ‘lawyers’ persuasion’ claimed from the lawyers’ visitation records obtained by the prosecutor.

However, the appellate court disregarded Hwang OO’s sudden testimony regarding murder instigation. Naturally, it was ignored because it was dismissible, but how would the Supreme Court, with its heavy workload, view it?

The scenario of overturning the original judgment and remanding the case was easily imaginable. The subsequent outcome of this trial, a fusion of targeted investigation, targeted prosecution, authority to judge evidence, legally distorted rulings, and media collusion, was also clearly discernible. They had been dragged to the edge of a cliff, and it was the final moment where, without needing to look around, one could simply close one’s eyes and give a slight push to fall.

Therefore, Jo Hee-seong found himself in a situation with no escape. Following this, he requested family visits for the first time, met with everyone, and then encountered the moment of BoGwang.

He did not experience BoGwang alone and forlorn in a solitary prison cell. He complained of suffocating chest discomfort, feeling as if he would die, and was taken for an outpatient examination at a private hospital.

The doctor examined him and stated that there was nothing wrong.

He pleaded, “Doctor, I still feel like I’m suffocating and about to die, so please examine me again,” and this examination, confirming no heart abnormalities, was repeated three times.

Then, he suddenly collapsed in front of the doctor.

The doctor recorded the cause of death as ‘acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)’. It is a condition that can be resolved quickly with a single injection.

When an elderly patient in their 70s complains of chest tightness and pain, the first thing suspected is myocardial infarction, a condition that can be easily detected and treated with an electrocardiogram and blood tests. Such tests were performed three times, yet no abnormalities were found.

From the doctor’s perspective, a perfectly healthy person’s heart suddenly stopped. Jo Hee-seong appeared in human form, but he was not human. This is because a human cannot suddenly stop their own heart. GuSeJu strategically experienced BoGwang when the time was right. (HaNaNim’s body is not a body of flesh or bone, but a body of light that flies, and it was fulfilled exactly as the word says that HaNaNim lives eternally, transformed into HaNaNim’s eternal body.)

Point 11 is the Supreme Court judgment.

Due to Jo Hee-seong’s strategic BoGwang, the prosecutor’s appeal was dismissed, and the original judgment was upheld, with the final acquittal on the charge of murder instigation being confirmed.

This final Supreme Court judgment revealed that all the harsh reports previously made against Jo Hee-seong and SeungNiJeDan were baseless. SeungNiJeDan is not a place that harms people or inflicts damage on society. It merely preaches that Jesus is a false GuSeJu and a devil’s spawn leading humanity down the path of death.

In light of this final Supreme Court judgment, if we summarise this case, it is the oppression by the vested interests, disguised as legal procedures, with the aim of eliminating a predetermined target.

This is a case where prosecutors, judges, and the media, virtually unchecked by anyone, united through a Christian network to distort the HaNaNim’s work (役事) of saving innocent citizens and humanity, sending it into ruin.

The prosecutor, who monopolised investigative and prosecutorial powers, freely chose how to exercise these rights, leading to endless prosecutions against targets through ‘dusting-off’ investigations and changes to the charges. The judge, who should have upheld law and justice, abused the freedom to admit evidence and the freedom of judgment, abandoning law, justice, and conscience.

Media that pursues selfish interests is not media. A religion that does not know what God is, or what sin is, is not a religion.

Now, let us return to the starting point and discuss how this incident began.

Point 0. This incident began with a private media company pursuing selfish interests.

A person named Tak Myeong-hwan personally established the “International Institute for Religious Issues” and operated a business publishing a magazine called “Monthly Contemporary Religion.” This “International Institute for Religious Issues,” established without any relevant professional qualifications, was, contrary to the credibility or scale implied by its name, a one-person or family business.

In an administrative blind spot, he established an institute and a media company under a grand name, unchecked by anyone. Yet, he was not a pastor, nor had he studied theology, nor had he conducted research at other institutes.

Although he was said to have majored in philosophy at university, it is unknown what he did in the world. From the 1970s, he travelled around religious organisations, printing monthly magazines on religious topics and primarily conducting business targeting churches.

Naturally, his own criteria for classifying cults and pseudo-religions would have been established, aligning with the perspective of the established mainstream Christianity, which had a large readership. Anyone can classify based on their own reasoning. That is freedom. However, publishing and distributing those personal judgments as printed material is a separate issue.

He conducted business by using the so-called ‘right to know’, ‘freedom of the press’, ‘freedom of expression’, and the ‘freedom of choice’ they didn’t mention, as both shield and weapon. Whether to report on your religion or not. Whether to label your religion as a cult or pseudo-religion or not. Whether to write favourably about your religion or to criticise it.

In this way, he ‘inserted a straw’, so to speak, selling magazines, receiving advertising revenue, and collecting donations. In this process, he became involved in numerous legal disputes and acquired a criminal record for extortion.

In other words, outwardly he was a respectable institute director, a media company representative, and a philosopher, but inwardly, by exploiting others’ weaknesses to gain undue advantage, he accumulated many grudges from various quarters.

Now, although SeungNiJeDan openly called Jesus a scoundrel and a devil’s spawn from its early days, Mr. Tak initially wrote favourable articles a few times. Then he revealed his true colours and resorted to extortion, demanding 300 million won, which was a very large sum in the 1980s. From the moment he threatened that SeungNiJeDan would close if they didn’t hand over the money, he was completely barred from entry.

Subsequently, Mr. Tak’s goal became “to eliminate Jo Hee-seong and SeungNiJeDan,” and he did everything he could to achieve that objective.

However, the more strongly he criticised this YeongSaengGyo, the higher Mr. Tak’s own status rose, and the better his magazines sold. Although Mr. Tak’s distorted thoughts and malicious claims were far from the truth, their provocative titles and content resonated with the magazine’s readership. In this way, he did well in the magazine business by increasingly using ugly, shameless, terrible, and shocking vocabulary.

Furthermore, with established churches cheering him on with “Well done! Well done! Fighting!”, Mr. Tak rolled up his sleeves and even mobilised spies to monitor every single move of Jo Hee-seong and SeungNiJeDan’s operations. Thus, using the ‘right to know’, ‘freedom of the press’, and ‘freedom of expression’ as a shield, he indiscriminately churned out arbitrary and malicious in-depth investigative articles.

In this process, he wrote articles treating conjectures like “a person who was seen is now unseen” and “believers are killed and secretly buried” as established facts. He also gathered families of those who had stopped attending and organised a ‘Missing Persons Committee’, using this as material for his articles.

Thus, by transforming Mr. Tak’s list of missing persons into a list of murder victims, and claiming ‘secret burials’ in a certain location near a MilSil, the arrest for murder charges without a body occurred at Point 1. The search for presumed buried remains was conducted, and the chicken bone incident at Point 3 took place.

Therefore, all articles related to YeongSaengGyo published in “Monthly Contemporary Religion” magazine are false. So, it would be a serious problem to quote and disseminate such false articles. If you have done so by mistake or unknowingly, please delete everything before it causes serious trouble. All journalists in Korea must come to their senses. If you spread articles written by others without verification, adding your own thoughts, it will lead to serious trouble.

Now, at Point 1, Jo Hee-seong was arrested on murder charges, which was the result of Mr. Tak spearheading petitions, complaints, accusations, and denunciations.

In fact, Mr. Tak’s accusations and denunciations were frequently filed after he was banned from entry, leading the Bucheon Police Station to monitor Jo Hee-seong’s every move for over two years, even renting a room directly in front of his accommodation. Then, after two years, these monitoring detectives performed a deep bow to Jo Hee-seong on the street. They were so impressed by his impeccably clean life and daily routine.

Consequently, the Chief of Bucheon Police Station, without even visiting YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan, spoke to people he met, and upon hearing their accounts, became curious, “What kind of place is YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan?” He then personally visited and even attended a service.

However, he was indicted when a Christian elder president took office. The police had already investigated everything there was to know, and despite having no evidence and no body, they forcefully indicted him on murder charges.

If one examines this carefully, it can be inferred from the context that the overall investigation directives likely came from that Christian elder president. This is because when the prosecution investigators had investigated the murder charges but could not press them and had to release him, former President Kim Young-sam personally called the prosecutor in charge and instructed him to prosecute for fraud, doing so in front of Jo Hee-seong.

Anyway, when Mr. Tak persistently filed accusations and denunciations, leading to Jo Hee-seong’s eventual arrest on murder charges and intense interrogations, Mr. Tak himself was murdered.

Considering the image of YeongSaengGyo ingrained in the public’s mind at the time, anyone in this situation would have been sufficiently brainwashed to be almost 100% certain that it was “the work of YeongSaengGyo.”

However, some time later, when they caught the culprit, it turned out to be Lim OO, the driver of a pastor from Daeseong Church, who had no connection whatsoever with YeongSaengGyo.

Lim OO confessed as follows: Tak had repeatedly demanded money from the pastor he served and had tormented him greatly during that time. Furthermore, by alternately writing articles calling his church a cult, then not a cult, then a cult again, he was unsettling the congregation, so he had been determined to get rid of this fellow. Just then, he heard Tak on television saying he would risk his life to eradicate the pseudo-cult YeongSaengGyo, and thinking this was his chance, he committed the crime.

So, even Tak, who had vehemently slandered YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan with such impossible claims for so many years, was not harmed by YeongSaengGyo. YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan is not a place that harms people.

However, there exists a force that desires and wishes to portray Jo Hee-seong Nim and YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan as a stronghold of evil, a place that should never be approached, and Tak was also used by that force.

It is, in fact, the Christian network.

Jo Hee-seong Nim preaches that “there was no religion” in this world, and he preaches that Jesus is a false GuSeJu and a vile spawn of the devil. For more details, please refer to the “Antichrist” chapter in 『참성경』. Therefore, from the Christian perspective, YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan is clearly a cult. However, there is no refutation possible against Jo Hee-seong Nim’s claims. That is why, from the perspective of those pastors, he had become a very troublesome presence.

Then, in 1988, when Jo Hee-seong Nim visited the United States and returned, he brought with him the Gaju Newspaper (dated March 16th, published March 10th). It contained an article by reporter Kim Hyang-nam, which was a very detailed report about a pastor from a large church who had contracted syphilis. And a considerable number of young believers copied it and distributed it around the Yeouido area.

So that pastor harboured a personal grudge against our SeungNiJeDan. As if it wasn’t troublesome enough that we called Jesus a spawn of the devil, when his own shameful secrets were exposed, he gritted his teeth, thinking, ‘Just you wait and see.’

Then, on 25 February 1993, shortly after President Kim Young-sam, who was a Christian elder, took office, he began to call for the eradication of pseudo-religions, and even removed the Buddhist statues that had long been on the grounds of the Blue House.

However, President Kim’s wife and the wife of that syphilis-afflicted pastor were alumni who had graduated from the same university and were close friends. Therefore, Jo Hee-seong Nim’s final defence before the judge was that, through the wives, they intended to have the staunch Christian elder president eradicate YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan, which called Jesus a spawn of the devil.

So, presidents who attend church, prosecutors who attend church, judges who attend church, media outlets that attend church, and so on. It’s not just that pastors stand on the pulpit and conduct worship services. They exert influence using their connections, interfering with civil servant appointments, distorting laws, spreading malicious reports, and disrupting the public welfare of this society. It is a dark entity hidden behind the curtain.

Although the powerful Roman Empire fostered Christianity to govern its vast colonies, which it had pioneered through war, by using a religion that believed in God, it wasn’t long before the Church, instead, placed the Roman Emperor under its heel and began to exert influence. We must recall the historical lesson that from that point, the Roman Empire entered a path of decline.

Christianity is a pseudo-religion that causes chaos in the world by promoting a false GuSeJu.

Love is not expressed through words. Actions truly speak. Therefore, one must discern its true nature from what is manifested through actions.

Even setting aside the title of GuSeJu, Jo Hee-seong Nim is a distinguished citizen of the Republic of Korea who has lived a life worthy of praise, both humanly and in terms of character.

During the Korean War, people were indiscriminately rounded up and put into prisoner-of-war camps. As a result, the POW camps contained not only North Korean soldiers but also nearly 30% innocent people. Among them were members of the National Assembly, politicians, and even South Korean soldiers. As armistice negotiations progressed, the decision was made to repatriate all those prisoners to North Korea. Nearly 30,000 patriotic young people faced unwanted repatriation to North Korea. The person who prevented that was none other than Jo Hee-seong Nim.

Amidst the ruins of war, having lost opportunities for study and a place to live, and from the depths of despair where there was no hope, he taught those around him and established churches. And he did so as a soldier. He is the unsung founder of Ildong Middle and High School in Pocheon. He also founded Iksan Middle and High School. In addition, he founded many other schools and churches.

What he desired was not to establish private schools or his own churches, nor was it to gain fame. He simply wished to give hope and opportunities for study to students amidst the ruins. Although his name was not left anywhere in those schools, shouldn’t that noble truth remain untarnished?

What he did was buy tents and stationery with his soldier’s pay, and after finishing his military duties, he taught civilian students at night. This was inspiring, and with the help of American soldiers and local dignitaries, it gradually took the form of schools, leading to today’s Iksan Middle and High School and Ildong Middle and High School. In addition, there are several other schools and churches.

His identity is revealed by his actions, which truly loved this nation and the people living on this land. Such a person, and such a life, were trampled upon by self-serving media outlets and public authorities, who mobilised all their resources with all sorts of insulting language and distorted application of the law. And what orchestrated this from behind the scenes is none other than the Christian network, which is now dressed in angels’ clothes and uttering angels’ words.

The truth that emerges no matter how hard one tries to distort it, and the truth that emerges no matter how hard one tries to conceal it. What proves that truth is not words, but the results that come from actions.

Although the GuSeJu of humanity appeared on this earth, the damage caused by distorting and suppressing the good news and the new word that could unite humanity as one is incalculable.

From an individual believer and their family, to the entire global family suffering from wars, typhoons, and natural disasters occurring all over the world, this damage has spanned over 30 years.

If such inhumane oppression had not existed, the ideology of treating everyone as one’s own body, and considering anyone’s sin as one’s own sin, would have spread from believers’ homes, beyond local communities, beyond nations, and throughout the entire world, creating harmonious families, stress-free workplaces, violence-free schools, corruption-free societies, and a world without war.

However, due to such ruthless and shameless oppression, the aspect of spiritual life that the true GuSeJu would bring has been completely turned upside down.

The opportunity for everyone to hold hands, embrace the hope of eternal life, and lead a happy spiritual life was stolen. As they became objects of hatred in their surroundings, countless people abandoned their faith, they were dismissed from their jobs, had to transfer schools, and even within their own homes, they became sources of worry. Walls of resentment built up between spouses, ultimately leading to family breakdowns. How immense is this damage?

The economic damage inflicted on a single individual alone is enormous, and for just one believer’s family, several lives have been ruined. Moments that will never come again in life, times when they should have enjoyed watching their children grow up together, due to walls of resentment, wives, husbands, and children were each robbed of opportunities and time that should have been joyful. How immense must that unspeakable damage be?

Today, the Republic of Korea has become a very peaceful and pleasant country to live in. There is no typhoon damage, no summer monsoon damage, crops are abundant every year, and because no wars occur, people are living well. Even during the IMF crisis, no one starved to death.

Many say that no country has developed so much from the ruins of war, but they do not realise that it is because the GuSeJu is Korean.

Look closely at the major events in Korea’s development process, the parts that were casually dismissed as “this was helped by heaven” or “this is a miracle.” Those were not miracles, but because the omnipotent and omniscient one is Korean. With that transcendent power, things moved “do this, do that” within the palm of Buddha’s hand, and it was achieved as if by a miracle.

The GuSeJu’s five major pledges were fulfilled in reality exactly as spoken, and they are still being kept today, for over 40 years.

However, the ability to fulfil those words was blocked from being spread to the global family. It blocked the opportunity for all nations on Earth to live well like the Republic of Korea, it blocked the opportunity to be protected from typhoons and natural disasters, it caused suffering due to poor harvests, and it caused everything to be lost through war.

All media outlets in Korea, all related public officials who distorted the law and made unjust dispositions, and the Christian network must all take responsibility for this immense damage.

Furthermore, Christian pastors should also be subject to the same application of the “fraudulent collection of offerings” charge that the court applied to Jo Hee-seong Nim, and the “freedom of religion” guaranteed by the constitution.

Pastors, prove that you believed in Jesus and went to heaven after death.

If you cannot prove that you went to heaven after death, those who donated to the church will file a “fraudulent collection of offerings” complaint and a lawsuit for the return of their donations. While serving a 2-year and 6-month prison sentence, those who could not file a complaint initially will again file a “fraudulent collection of offerings” complaint and a lawsuit for the return of their donations. Then you will receive an additional 4 years in prison.

At this point, those people are individuals who haven’t even made donations. No matter what the pastor says, the court will rule that the pastor must return the money. If that money is not returned quickly, the pastor’s church will have to be put up for auction.

The following is an example showing how the Supreme Court interpreted the freedom of religion guaranteed by the constitution when it punished Jo Hee-seong Nim of SeungNiJeDan for the crime of fraudulent collection of offerings, a charge not even found in criminal law.

a. Freedom of religion is based on the human spiritual world, and to the extent that it means freedom of belief, which is an inner human freedom, it cannot be restricted, just like the freedom of conscience that is not expressed externally. However, when it is expressed as a religious act, it is a freedom of external action, and therefore it must naturally be restricted for the maintenance of order, and it can also be restricted by law for the public welfare.

b. A case where the leader of the so-called ‘SeungNiJeDan’ was punished for fraud for receiving money from believers under the pretext of offerings.

Praying to HaNaNim internally, alone at home with a bowl of water, is not called religion. This is a legal interpretation that clearly applies to Christians who receive offerings through external acts of preaching, shouting “Jesus to Heaven! Unbelievers to Hell!”, and the law must be enforced impartially.

Furthermore, YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan has never caused social chaos, destroyed order, or harmed public welfare. It was the media organisations that stirred up the nation with fake news that caused social controversy, while YeongSaengGyo SeungNiJeDan merely quietly held daily worship services and practised the faith guaranteed by the constitution. The court misunderstood the facts.

Conclusion

The changes in human civilisation have been driven by discovery and invention. Through astonishing technological advancements, from the discovery of fire, the invention of the wheel, steam and electricity, semiconductors and computers, to robots and artificial intelligence, humanity in the 21st century is expanding its domain beyond Earth and towards the cosmos.

What was the driving force behind these discoveries and inventions? Ultimately, wasn’t it the effort to maximise profits through increased commercial productivity and cost reduction, which is the core of material civilisation?

As humanity went through the industrialisation era, based on religions that only know a part, and on academic disciplines that do not even know humanity itself, which is the foundation of scholarship, the existence of human beings came to be perceived as ‘a means or resource for production’. Now, scenes of human lives being destroyed by drones carrying missiles or bombs, as if playing a video game, are vividly being revealed.

This reality is evidence that established religions and academic disciplines, which can be called the spiritual foundation of human civilisation, and brilliant technological advancements, are not actually aiming for human happiness.

At this point, the discovery of “the essence of humanity” signifies a great transition to a spiritual civilisation that will save humanity from the dire reality of material civilisation. Strictly speaking, the era of ignorance about humanity, which is the foundation of religion and academia, is coming to an end due to accumulated problems, and upon the foundation of truly knowing the essence of humanity, true religion and true scholarship will fundamentally resolve those problems and drive a transcendentally advanced civilisation.

The ‘essence of humanity’ is divine, an existence where HaNaNim and the devil coexist.

Divinity is a spiritual existence, and since spirit refers to a person’s mind, and the mind is the master of a person, a person is a spiritual existence, and thus a person is divine in themselves. Furthermore, life itself is HaNaNim and death itself is the devil, and these two divinities coexist within a person. Therefore, one lives by HaNaNim and comes to death by the devil.

However, currently, the master of a person is the consciousness called ‘I’, that is, the spirit of greed. Truly understanding the fact that life dies as a result of the spirit of greed committing sin, the revolution within humanity that constantly rejects the assertions of the consciousness called ‘I’ and follows the guidance of the spirit of conscience is precisely the true religious work of HaNaNim. This is a spiritual revolution that will initiate a new human civilisation by resetting all problems caused by material civilisation at their root level, and it is the realisation of human salvation.

The Bible, Buddhist scriptures, and prophetic books that promised human salvation foretold the appearance of the GuSeJu, and this was realised in the latter half of the 20th century. However, established religious figures, deceived by falsehoods and misinterpreting scriptures, trapped in the devil’s schemes, are hostile towards the GuSeJu who would bring blessings to all humanity, for the sake of their own vested interests and personal greed. Unaware that their own interpretation of scriptures might be wrong, they boldly brand the new word as a pseudo-religion by their own standards, and, as explained earlier, they have been oppressing it for over 40 years by mobilising all means at their disposal.

The undeniable fact that the GuSeJu appeared as a Korean in this world can be seen by looking at today’s international situation and the Republic of Korea. The five major pledges to prove the GuSeJu’s appearance are being realised in reality.

From 1981, it was declared, “I will eliminate global communism.” Ten years later, in 1991, global communism vanished instantly without a single drop of blood shed, starting from the Soviet Union, the birthplace of communism. The Republic of Korea, which suffered 36 years of colonial rule, then war after liberation, turning everything to ashes, has now, 70 years later, become a prosperous nation. Protected from monsoon rains and typhoons, it enjoys abundant harvests every year, and war cannot break out between North and South Korea.

The reason communism perished is that the GuSeJu made communists’ hearts dislike communism. The reason the Republic of Korea became a prosperous nation is that the GuSeJu made the entire world like and want to help the Republic of Korea, thereby making even impossible things happen.

The appearance of the GuSeJu as a Korean was not a coincidence, but a predestined work of HaNaNim that has been hidden and passed down through various scriptures and prophets.

Koreans are precisely the pure Israelite lineage that will produce the GuSeJu, as the high priestly tribe of ancient Israel migrated northeast and settled on the Korean Peninsula. Korea’s traditional religious beliefs are the Innaecheon ideology, which states “Man is HaNaNim,” and the nation-founding ideal of Hongik Ingan, which means “to broadly benefit humanity.” However, until the appearance of the GuSeJu, no one knew its hidden meaning. Most Koreans would say they superficially know “Innaecheon ideology” and “Hongik Ingan” from learning them in school, but they do not truly know the fact that Koreans are precisely the pure Israelite lineage that will produce the GuSeJu, the protagonist of human salvation.

In fact, the InNaeCheon ideology, having received HaNaNim’s seal, is melted into the unconscious of Korean people through the lineage of Israel. Although people do not outwardly say that a person is HaNaNim, the pattern that appears as a heart of respecting others and considering their positions is precisely Korea’s Jeong (情), and the widespread usage of the word “우리” (we/us), which suppresses one’s selfish desires and prioritises the values of the community, is remarkably different. On this foundation, patterns of loving peace, public morality, etiquette, a sense of order, a conscientious society, the spirit of patriotism and love for the people, and collective resistance to corruption appear.

To summarise, the GuSeJu has appeared, and he is a Korean person. Seeing the incredible development of the Republic of Korea, there is no doubt. Any nation, when it moves forward centred on the true GuSeJu, can create a miraculous ‘역사’ (God’s work) like the Republic of Korea, whereas if it opposes the GuSeJu, that government and that nation will perish.

Therefore, knowing the appearance of the GuSeJu, one must discern the real trials encountered due to the opposition of established powers and the false information that has been distorted and spread. Widely proclaim the appearance of the true GuSeJu who speaks the complete word, and respond from the side of the true GuSeJu in the great ‘역사’ (God’s work) of overturning this sinful world, which is quietly unfolding at this moment, the great ‘역사’ (God’s work) of the creation of a new heaven and earth. What is not realised in reality as spoken, and what is false and vain, not belonging to the real world, must be abolished, and by accepting the true GuSeJu’s words, which are true and beneficial, all humanity must recognise that they are a community of destiny, like a single tree. Realising that the venerable HaNaNim resides within the person visible before one’s eyes, one must crush and break the desires of the ‘나’ (I), which is the root of sin. In a world where HaNaNim is seen with one’s eyes, by serving each other as one serves HaNaNim, eventually the era of humanity belonging to sin will end, and spiritually advanced humanity must actively participate in the construction of an earthly heaven where they become one with HaNaNim’s spirit.